Select Month
  • Select Month
  • April 1, 2025
  • March 4, 2025
  • December 12, 2024
  • October 15, 2024
  • August 30, 2024
  • June 19, 2024
  • April 30, 2024
  • April 16, 2024
  • February 7, 2024
  • January 10, 2024
  • September 21, 2023
  • July 31, 2023
  • May 16, 2023
  • April 14, 2023
  • February 28, 2023
  • January 19, 2023
  • November 30, 2022
  • October 13, 2022
  • September 14, 2022
  • August 28, 2022
  • July 21, 2022
  • July 7, 2022
  • May 12, 2022
  • April 27, 2022
  • March 30, 2022
  • February 23, 2022
  • January 19, 2022
  • December 16, 2021
  • November 30, 2021
  • October 14, 2021
  • September 7, 2021
  • August 25, 2021
  • July 22, 2021
  • July 14, 2021
  • June 22, 2021
  • May 12, 2021
  • April 20, 2021
  • March 31, 2021
  • March 24, 2021
  • February 26, 2021
  • December 17, 2020
  • November 24, 2020
  • October 13, 2020
  • August 19, 2020
  • July 15, 2020
  • June 18, 2020
  • June 10, 2020
  • April 27, 2020
  • April 13, 2020
  • March 26, 2020
  • March 18, 2020
  • February 26, 2020
  • January 22, 2020
  • December 17, 2019
  • November 12, 2019
  • October 16, 2019
  • September 26, 2019
  • August 26, 2019
  • July 23, 2019
  • June 24, 2019
  • May 21, 2019
  • April 24, 2019
  • March 18, 2019
  • February 26, 2019
  • January 24, 2019
  • December 19, 2018
  • November 15, 2018
  • October 16, 2018
  • September 26, 2018
  • August 21, 2018
  • July 9, 2018
  • June 5, 2018
  • May 8, 2018
  • April 20, 2018
  • December 7, 2017
  • November 8, 2017
  • September 7, 2017
  • July 28, 2017
  • May 10, 2017
  • March 29, 2017
  • December 8, 2016
  • October 26, 2016
  • September 27, 2016
  • July 28, 2016
  • June 1, 2016
  • April 19, 2016
  • March 3, 2016
  • January 26, 2016
  • December 8, 2015
  • October 27, 2015
  • September 24, 2015
  • August 20, 2015
  • August 4, 2015
  • July 6, 2015
  • June 9, 2015
  • April 20, 2015
  • March 12, 2015
  • February 11, 2015
  • January 15, 2015
  • November 24, 2014
  • September 23, 2014
  • August 19, 2014
  • July 9, 2014
  • June 5, 2014
  • May 8, 2014
  • April 16, 2014
  • March 24, 2014
  • February 27, 2014
  • February 12, 2014
  • January 27, 2014
  • January 9, 2014
  • December 10, 2013
  • November 11, 2013
  • October 22, 2013
  • October 2, 2013
  • September 17, 2013
  • September 4, 2013
  • August 21, 2013
  • July 25, 2013
  • July 10, 2013
  • June 27, 2013
  • June 17, 2013
  • June 4, 2013
  • May 23, 2013
  • May 14, 2013
  • May 2, 2013
  • April 24, 2013
  • January 1, 2000

Practice Areas

Addressing Workplace Romance: Options for Employers

With Valentine’s Day approaching, what better topic than workplace romance.

When a workplace romance ends, it can have all kinds of repercussions.   For example, the dumped co-worker might attempt to woo back their former lover, and those attempts could be viewed as contributing to a hostile work environment if the attention is no longer welcome.

More concerning is when the relationship involves a supervisor or a higher-ranking colleague and a subordinate or lower-ranking employee.  In such instances, the employee in the less powerful position might claim that the romantic advances were never welcomed.  They may argue that any “consent” to the relationship was actually due to coercion, fear of demotion or termination, or in response to a promised promotion or other preferential treatment.

Implications of workplace romance aren’t limited to the end of the relationship. They can include issues like:

  • public displays of affection;
  • inappropriate sharing of confidential company information between romantic partners;
  • inappropriate gossiping among co-workers;
  • less productivity from the couple and their colleagues;
  • claims of favoritism;
  • poor employee morale; and
  • damage to the business because the pairing may be seen as unprofessional.

What courses of action are available to employers, given the stakes that are involved?

Workplace Romance Policy

One option is to implement a workplace romance policy.  Some workplace romance policies forbid romances between employees with significantly different rank, such as prohibiting supervisors from dating people who report directly to them. Other policies ban workplace dating entirely.

Workplace romance policies should clearly state that romantic relationships between co-workers are not the company’s business unless the office romance affects the workplace.

Employers should also be mindful of unintended consequences that workplace romance policies may have. There’s always the possibility that employees will date and keep it a secret.  In the event that harassment occurs, the victim may hesitate to report it for fear of being disciplined for violating the workplace romance policy.

Love Contracts

Another option is a “love contract” (or “consensual relationship agreement”).  A love contract is an agreement where, in theory, employees disclose office romances while protecting their employer from liability if the relationship ends.

The terms of love contracts are fairly robust, and typically include terms addressing:

  • the voluntary nature of the couple’s relationship;
  • compliance with the employer’s anti-harassment policy;
  • termination of the relationship;
  • retaliation;
  • expected workplace behavior; and
  • modification of reporting relationships.

A lot of employers are drawn to the idea that love contracts can reduce any risks associated with sexual harassment lawsuits.

Love contracts, however, don’t entirely protect employers from liability. The romantic relationships most likely to cause problems for an employer are those in which the participants will be least likely to self-report and sign a love contract (i.e., affairs).

The greater benefit of love contracts is that they help employers maintain a functional office environment. This can be done by reminding the couple to behave professionally and securing the couple’s agreement to keep public displays of affection out of the workplace.

Employers who ultimately do opt for the use of love contracts must recognize that requiring a love contract is no substitute for having a well-implemented policy against sexual harassment. This includes appropriate training for all levels of staff and management and a sound enforcement program.

Leave a Comment